CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Investigating the Impact of Random Waypoint AND Vector Mobility Models on AODV, OLSR and GRP Routing Protocols in MANET

by Sohajdeep Singh, Parveen Kakkar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 63 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Sohajdeep Singh, Parveen Kakkar
10.5120/10448-5148

Sohajdeep Singh, Parveen Kakkar . Investigating the Impact of Random Waypoint AND Vector Mobility Models on AODV, OLSR and GRP Routing Protocols in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 63, 3 ( February 2013), 30-34. DOI=10.5120/10448-5148

@article{ 10.5120/10448-5148,
author = { Sohajdeep Singh, Parveen Kakkar },
title = { Investigating the Impact of Random Waypoint AND Vector Mobility Models on AODV, OLSR and GRP Routing Protocols in MANET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2013 },
volume = { 63 },
number = { 3 },
month = { February },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 30-34 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume63/number3/10448-5148/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10448-5148 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:13:12.952604+05:30
%A Sohajdeep Singh
%A Parveen Kakkar
%T Investigating the Impact of Random Waypoint AND Vector Mobility Models on AODV, OLSR and GRP Routing Protocols in MANET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 63
%N 3
%P 30-34
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile nodes forming a temporary network without the need for base stations or any other preexistingnetwork infrastructure. Due to link instability, node mobility and frequently changing topologies routing becomes one of the core issues in MANETs. this paper examine Random Waypoint Mobility model and Vector Mobility model and study their impact on AODV, OLSR and GRP routing protocols with Throughput ,End-to-End Delay and Network Load as Performance Metrics.

References
  1. Dimitri Perrin, Hiroyuki Ohsaki 2012 Impact of Mobility and Topology on Information Diffusion in MANETs. IEEE.
  2. Shavetaand Krishan Kumar Saraswat2012 Pursue Shortest Mobility Model and Its Comparison in MANET. VSRD International Journal of CS & IT Vol. 2 (6) pp 462-472
  3. Anil Bhasin , Dinesh Kumar 2012. Comparative Study of Chain Mobility Models using Reactive Routing protocols. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 42– No. 9, March 2012
  4. K. Sreenivasulu1, Mr. A. L. Srinivasulu2011. Improving Routing Efficiency Based On Random Direction Mobility Model In Manets. International Journal of Smart Sensors and Ad Hoc Networks (IJSSAN) Volume-1, Issue-1.
  5. Juan-Carlos Cano and Pietro Manzoni 2011. Group mobility impact over TCP and CBR traffic in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE
  6. Sabina Barakovi?, SuadKasapovi?, and JasminaBarakovi?2010. Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Traffic and Mobility Models. TelforJournal, Vol. 2, No. 1,.
  7. S. R. Biradar, Hiren H D Sharma, Kalpana Sharma, Subir Kumar Sarkar, Puttamadappa C 2009. Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs using Group Mobility Model IEEE.
  8. Liu Tie-yuan?CHANGLiang?GuTian-long 2009 Analyzing the Impact of Entity Mobility Models on the Performance of Routing Protocols in the MANET. IEEE.
  9. Suresh Kumar, R. K. Rathy and DiwakarPandey2009. Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks using NS2. 2ndIEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.
  10. Opnet Technologies, Inc. "OPNET Simulator," Internet: www. opnet. com, date last viewed: 2009-12-21.
  11. S. R. Biradar, Hiren H D Sharma, KalpanaShrama and Subir Kumar Sarkar2009. Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols of WSNs using Group Mobility Model", IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, pages 192-195.
  12. N. Aschenbruck, E. Gerhands-Padilla, P. Martini 2008. A Survey on mobility models for Performance analysis in Tactical Mobile networks. Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technology, Vol. 2 pp. 54-61.
  13. K. Salah, P. Calyam, and M. I. Buhari2007. Assessing Readiness of IP Networks to Support Desktop Video Conferencing Using OPNET. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, no. pp. 1-23.
  14. D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and D. Maltz2007. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile", RFC 4728.
  15. Bai Fan, Helmy, Ahmed 2006. A Survey of Mobility Models in Wireless Adhoc Networks. Chapter 1 in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. Kluwer Academic.
  16. 16. L. Hogie, P. Bouvry, and F. Guinand2006. An Overview of MANET Simulation. ElectronicNotes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 81-101.
  17. 17. S. S. Miremadil, M. Fazelil, A. Patooghyl, S. G. Miremadi 2006. Performance Evaluation of a Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE.
  18. Anipakala Suresh 2005. Performance Analysis of Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) Using OPNET Simulator Communication Networks. University of Bremen.
  19. K. Akkaya and M. Younis2005. A survey of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Network Journal, pp 325-349.
  20. Juan-Carlos Cano, Pietro Manzoni and Miguel Sanchez 2004. Evaluating the impact of group mobility on the performance of mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE.
  21. HasnaaMoustafa and HoudaLabiod2004. A Performance Analysis of Source Routing-based Multicast Protocol (SRMP) Using Different Mobility Models. IEEE.
  22. F. Bai, N Sadagopan, A. Helmy2003. IMPORTANT: A framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks. IEEE INFOCOM.
  23. S. Das, C. E. Perkins, E. Royer 2002. Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. IETF Draft.
  24. P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler, T. Clausen, A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, L. Viennot. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks. Hypercom Project, INRIA Rocquencourt, BP 105, 78153 Le ChesnayCedex, France.
  25. Jing Xie, Luis Girons Quesada and YumingJiang . A Threshold-based Hybrid Routing Protocol for MANET. Department of Telematics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  26. Ying Ge. Quality of Service Routing in Ad-Hoc Networks Using OLSR" Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03)0-7695-1874-5/03 $17. 00 © 2002 IEEE.
  27. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer, "Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing", Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, USA, pages 90-100, February 1999.
  28. X. Chang, "Network Simulations with OPNET," Presented at Simulation Conference Proceedings, 1999 Winter, 1999, pp. 307-314.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV OLSR GRP Random Waypoint Mobility Model Vector Mobility model