CFP last date
20 March 2024
Reseach Article

In-Detail Analysis on Custom Teaching and Learning Framework

by Subhabrata Sengupta, Anish Banerjee, Satyajit Chakrabarti
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 33
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Subhabrata Sengupta, Anish Banerjee, Satyajit Chakrabarti
10.5120/ijca2020920390

Subhabrata Sengupta, Anish Banerjee, Satyajit Chakrabarti . In-Detail Analysis on Custom Teaching and Learning Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 33 ( Jun 2020), 10-15. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920390

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920390,
author = { Subhabrata Sengupta, Anish Banerjee, Satyajit Chakrabarti },
title = { In-Detail Analysis on Custom Teaching and Learning Framework },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2020 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 33 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number33/31415-2020920390/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920390 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:44:07.690014+05:30
%A Subhabrata Sengupta
%A Anish Banerjee
%A Satyajit Chakrabarti
%T In-Detail Analysis on Custom Teaching and Learning Framework
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 33
%P 10-15
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In the field of Information recovery, the primary goal is to discover importance just as the most significant data as for certain inquiries. In any case, the primary issue with respect to recovery has consistently been, that the pursuit region is tremendous to such an extent that it has gotten hard to recover relevant data productively. It has been seen that the conventional ontological authoritative data causes superfluous additional CPU cost, while the client inquiries, for the most part, focus on a particular space. What's more, another difficult issue in such manner is the key expression extraction from the question which has likewise a significant job for pinpointing looking to a particular recovery space. By centering, these restrictions and difficulties, we have focused on our data recovery framework, especially towards assessment question recovery so as to take into account the interest of different assessment-related inquiries. The inquiry data has been composed according to the ontological relationship among different classes and a characteristic language parser will be utilized during key-phrase extraction for proficient recovery of inquiries most ideally requested as for the level of importance to the questions. Open learning analytics (OLA) is a moderately new part of learning analytics (LA) which rose because of the developing interest for self-sorted out, organized, and long-lasting learning opportunities. In this paper, we present the goal - question - indicator (GQI) approach for PLA and give the applied, structure, usage and assessment subtleties of the pointer motor segment of the open learning analytics platform (OpenLAP) that draws in end-clients in the pointer age process by supporting them in defining objectives, offering conversation starters, and self-characterizing pointers..

References
  1. Arham Muslim, et al. ,”A Rule-Based Indicator Definition Tool for Personalized Learning Analytics”, Ahad et al. Smart Learning Environments (2018)
  2. Marie Bienkowski et. Al, “Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief”,U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology,2012
  3. Filippo Sciarrone et. Al. “Machine Learning and Learning Analytics: Integrating Data with Learning”, IEEE, 2015
  4. Fedor Duzhin et. Al. ,”Machine Learning-Based App for Self-Evaluation of Teacher-Specifific Instructional Style and Tools”, Educ. Sci. 2018
  5. Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, “Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics Toolkit for Teachers.” Educational Technology & Society,2015.
  6. Daniel Spikol et. Al. “Using Multimodal Learning Analytics to Identify Aspects of Collaboration in Project-Based Learning”, CSCL 2017 Proceedings
  7. Muslim, A., Chatti, M., Mughal, M. and Schroeder, U. “The Goal - Question - Indicator Approach for Personalized Learning Analytics”, In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2017)
  8. Daniel Spikol et. Al. “Supervised machine learning in multimodal learning analytics for estimating success in project-based learning”, J Comput Assist Learn. 2018.
  9. Dezhao Song, “Natural Language Question Answering and Analytics for Diverse and Interlinked Datasets”, Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2015
  10. Pardo et. Al. “Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback”, British Educational Research Association, 2017
  11. A. Zafra and S. Ventura, “Predicting student grades in learning management systems with multiple instance learning genetic programming,” in Educational Data Mining - EDM 2009, Cordoba, Spain, July 1-3, 2009. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining., 2009, pp. 309–318. [Online]. Available: http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2009/uploads/proceedings/zafra.pdf
  12. R. Ferguson, “The state of learning analytics in 2012: a review and future challenges,” Tech. Rep. KMI-12-01, vol. 4, 2012.
  13. J. P. Campbel, P. B. DeBlois, and D. G. Oblinger, “Academic analytics:A new tool for a new era,” EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 42, pp. 40–57,1996.
  14. D. Clow, “The learning analytics cycle: Closing the loop effectively,” in Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, ser. LAK ’12. New York, NY, USA:ACM, 2012, pp. 134–138. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10. 1145/2330601.2330636
  15. G. Gauthier, “Using teaching analytic to inform assessment practices in technology mediated problem solving tasks,” in Proceeding of Workshop on Teaching Analytics at the 3rd Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge LAK 2013, April 2013, pp. 1–8.
  16. L. P. Prieto, S. Villagra, V. I. M. J. Abelln, A. Martnez-Mons, and Y. Dimitriadis, “Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms,” Computers & Education, vol. 57, pp. 1214–1227, 08 2011.
  17. S. Sergis and D. Sampson, “Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: a systematic literature review,” in Learning Analytics. From Research to Practice, A. Pea-Ayala, Ed. Berlin: Springer, 2017, pp. 25–63.
  18. T. Mitchell, Machine Learning. Mc Graw-Hill International Editions, 1997.
  19. A. Zafra and S. Ventura, “Predicting student grades in learning management systems with multiple instance learning genetic programming,” in Educational Data Mining - EDM 2009, Cordoba, Spain, July 1-3, 2009. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining., 2009, pp. 309–318. [Online]. Available:http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2009/uploads/proceedings/zafra.pdf
  20. V. Efrati, C. Limongelli, and F. Sciarrone, “A data mining approach to the analysis of students’ learning styles in an e-learning community: A case study,” in Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge, C. Stephanidis and M. Antona, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 289–300.
  21. M. De Marsico, F. Sciarrone, A. Sterbini, and M. Temperini, “Supporting mediated peer-evaluation to grade answers to open-ended questions,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 4, 2017.
  22. A. Sterbini and M. Temperini, “Correcting open-answer questionnaires through a bayesian-network model of peer-based assessment,” in Procedings of the International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2012, 2012.
  23. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-shapiro, and P. Smyth, “From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases,” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 37–54, 1996.
  24. J. Han and M. Kamber, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2006.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Learning Analytics Open Learning Analytics Personalized Learning Analytics OpenLAP Semantic web Search Engine Personalization NLP Web-Link Categorization Parse Tree