CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Experimental Comparison of Methods for Multi-label Classification in different Application Domains

by Passent El Kafrawy, Amr Mausad, Heba Esmail
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 114 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Passent El Kafrawy, Amr Mausad, Heba Esmail
10.5120/20083-1666

Passent El Kafrawy, Amr Mausad, Heba Esmail . Experimental Comparison of Methods for Multi-label Classification in different Application Domains. International Journal of Computer Applications. 114, 19 ( March 2015), 1-9. DOI=10.5120/20083-1666

@article{ 10.5120/20083-1666,
author = { Passent El Kafrawy, Amr Mausad, Heba Esmail },
title = { Experimental Comparison of Methods for Multi-label Classification in different Application Domains },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2015 },
volume = { 114 },
number = { 19 },
month = { March },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-9 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume114/number19/20083-1666/ },
doi = { 10.5120/20083-1666 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:53:14.161772+05:30
%A Passent El Kafrawy
%A Amr Mausad
%A Heba Esmail
%T Experimental Comparison of Methods for Multi-label Classification in different Application Domains
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 114
%N 19
%P 1-9
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Real-world applications have begun to adopt the multi-label paradigm. The multi-label classification implies an extra dimension because each example might be associated with multiple labels (different possible classes), as opposed to a single class or label (binary, multi-class) classification. And with increasing number of possible multi-label applications in most ecosystems, there is little effort in comparing the different multi-label methods in different domains. Hence, there is need for a comprehensive overview of methods and metrics. In this study, we experimentally evaluate 11 methods for multi-label learning using 6 evaluation measures over seven benchmark datasets. The results of the experimental comparison revealed that the best performing method for both the example- based evaluation measures and the label-based evaluation measures are ECC on all measures when using C4. 5 tree classifier as a single-label base learner.

References
  1. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, Multi label classification: an overview, International Journal of Data Warehouse and Mining 3 (3) (2007) 1–13.
  2. G. Tsoumakas, I. Vlahavas, Random k-labelsets: an ensemble method for multi-label classification, in: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on Machine Learning, 2007, pp. 406–417.
  3. J. Read, B. Pfahringer, G. Holmes, Multi-label classification using ensembles of pruned sets, in: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2008, pp. 995–1000.
  4. J. F ¨ urnkranz, Round robin classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research 2(2002)721–747.
  5. T. -F. Wu, C. -J. Lin, R. C. Weng, Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling, Journal of Machine Learning Research 5 (2004) 975–1005.
  6. J. Read, B. Pfahringer, G. Holmes, E. Frank, Classifier chains for multi-label classification, in: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Machine Learning, 2009, pp. 254–269.
  7. J. Read, B. Pfahringer and G. Holmes, "Multi-label classification using ensembles of pruned sets", Proc 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy, pages 995-1000. IEEE Computer Society, 2008.
  8. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, I. Vlahavas, Effective and efficient multi-label classification in domains with large number of labels, in: Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD Workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data, 2008, pp. 30–44.
  9. S. -H. Park,J. F ¨ urnkranz, Efficient pairwise classification, in: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning,2007,pp. 658–665.
  10. E. L. Menc?´a, S. -H. Park,J. F ¨ urnkranz, Efficient voting prediction for pairwise multi-label classification,Neurocomputing73(2010)1164–1176.
  11. A. Clare, R. D. King, Knowledge discovery in multi-label phenotype data, in: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on PKDD, 2001, pp. 42–53.
  12. M. L. Zhang, Z. H. Zhou, Multi-label neural networks with applications to functional genomics and text categorization, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 18 (10) (2006) 1338–1351.
  13. R. E. Schapire, Y. Singer, Boostexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization, Machine Learning 39 (2000) 135–168.
  14. F. DeComite, R. Gilleron, M. Tommasi, Learning multi-label alternating decision trees from texts and data, in: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition, 2003, pp. 35–49.
  15. M. L. Zhang, Z. H. Zhou, ML-kNN: a lazy learning approach to multi-label learning, Pattern Recognition 40 (7) (2007) 2038–2048.
  16. A. Elisseeff, J. Weston, A Kernel method for multi-labelled classification, in: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2005, pp. 274–281.
  17. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, I. Vlahavas, Mining multi-label data, in: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 667–685.
  18. I. H. Witten, ans E. Frank, "Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning tools and techniques", Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
  19. G. Tsoumakas, R. Friberg, E. Spyromitros-Xiou, I, Kataks, and J. Vilcek, "Mulan software - java classes for multi-label classification Available at: http://mlkd. csd. auth. gr/multilabel. html#Software
  20. M. Friedman, A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11 (1940) 86–92.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Multi-Label classification Multi-Label learning Data Mining

Powered by PhDFocusTM